Even though Jewish scriptures talk about Egypt, no Egyptian text ever found contains a single reference to Jews in Egypt. States William G. Dever, who has spent thirty years on Biblical archaeology in the near east: “It must be borne in my mind that no Egyptian text ever found contains a single reference to Hebrews or Israelites in Egypt, much less to an Exodus.” ( Who Were the Early Israelites and Where Did They Come From?, Wm.B.Erdmans Publishing Company, Cambridge, 2006; pg 12-13). The only reason why their scriptures talk about Egypt is because their scriptures were modified at a later point of time. This was done under instructions from Moses for particular reasons.
You must have already heard about the claim that Jews are Yadavas of India, the tribe in which Krishna, the Godly figure of Indians, was born. The very name Hebrew is derived from Abhirah, a tribe associated with Krishna in Indian epic Mahabharat. The word Yadavas was derived from the term “Yah Devas,” meaning Devas of Yah. Those days, people living in India were called Devas. And when these external people migrated into India from an external region called Yah, the local people called them the Devas of Yah or Yah Devas, which went on to become Yadavas. Can you spot the connection between the term “Yah Devas” and the name Yahweh, the single most important name of the God of Jews, and of all Abrahamic religions? A large number of Jewish names and concepts can be traced back to Krishna and Yadavas of India, and the Indian religion, through some simple linguistic analysis. I have given some important comparisons in the following chart, taken from the book. You can make a judgement for yourself. Please click on the chart below to expand it.
If you have a little bit of knowledge of linguistics, the words would look much closer than you think. For example, I have given the comparison between Hamakom and Gomakom. We need to note that consonants G and H are guttural sounds, both of them are emitted from throat. For example, the Vaishnavite Goddess Mahalaxmi is often pronounced as Magalaxmi in South India - Consonant H is replaced by Consonant G. Does this mean that both are different Goddesses? Hamakom and Gomakom are almost identical words and are much closer to each other than it readily appears - after thousands of years of separation, a little change in the words is expected. Similarly, Keturah and Gayatri, Keshav and Hashem - these are all very very close to each other phonetically, and are almost identical words. The book actually develops a simple linguistic framework to help the reader do such comparisons by himself/herself. The above provided data is only a portion of the connection that exists between the Jews and the Yadavas of India; the book covers it in a much more detailed manner.
When did these Semitic people migrate into India? How long did they stay there? When and how and why did they migrate out of India? A huge missing chunk of world history!
Back to Christianity and Judaism History Home Page
You must have already heard about the claim that Jews are Yadavas of India, the tribe in which Krishna, the Godly figure of Indians, was born. The very name Hebrew is derived from Abhirah, a tribe associated with Krishna in Indian epic Mahabharat. The word Yadavas was derived from the term “Yah Devas,” meaning Devas of Yah. Those days, people living in India were called Devas. And when these external people migrated into India from an external region called Yah, the local people called them the Devas of Yah or Yah Devas, which went on to become Yadavas. Can you spot the connection between the term “Yah Devas” and the name Yahweh, the single most important name of the God of Jews, and of all Abrahamic religions? A large number of Jewish names and concepts can be traced back to Krishna and Yadavas of India, and the Indian religion, through some simple linguistic analysis. I have given some important comparisons in the following chart, taken from the book. You can make a judgement for yourself. Please click on the chart below to expand it.
If you have a little bit of knowledge of linguistics, the words would look much closer than you think. For example, I have given the comparison between Hamakom and Gomakom. We need to note that consonants G and H are guttural sounds, both of them are emitted from throat. For example, the Vaishnavite Goddess Mahalaxmi is often pronounced as Magalaxmi in South India - Consonant H is replaced by Consonant G. Does this mean that both are different Goddesses? Hamakom and Gomakom are almost identical words and are much closer to each other than it readily appears - after thousands of years of separation, a little change in the words is expected. Similarly, Keturah and Gayatri, Keshav and Hashem - these are all very very close to each other phonetically, and are almost identical words. The book actually develops a simple linguistic framework to help the reader do such comparisons by himself/herself. The above provided data is only a portion of the connection that exists between the Jews and the Yadavas of India; the book covers it in a much more detailed manner.
When did these Semitic people migrate into India? How long did they stay there? When and how and why did they migrate out of India? A huge missing chunk of world history!
Back to Christianity and Judaism History Home Page
Hashem literally means "the name" - it is two words, "Ha" + "Shem". Adonai means "Lord" - this word is substituted for the divine name YHVH when Jewish scriptures and prayers are read aloud, but the written form remains as YHVH (Yaweh, sometimes rendered as Jehovah). These facts argue against at least some of the "equivalents" in the table presented here.
ReplyDeleteYour explanation does not tell why Hashem is a friendly name of God having lesser sanctity as compared to other names, and why plural Adonai is used for God while singular Adonai is used for human.
ReplyDeleteDear Sir,
ReplyDeleteI disagree with you that Moses is buried in Kashmir!
I enclose my manuscript awaiting publication. The Kashmiris named all their landmarks from their homeland out of nostalgia! Moses is actually buried in the Middle East as per the Bible. That is why Jesus is buried in Kashmir, because he came to Kashmir to preach to the Lost Tribes of Israel to fulfill the promise of God to Moses. He is buried in Srinagar. This is evident from the fact that Kashmiris have names and customs more akin to the Middle East and totally different from the rest of India. Alberuni the traveller, affirms that in 1200 AD all Kashmir was Jewish and a non-Jew was not allowed into Kashmir. After the coming of Islam these people were forcibly converted, even though they had Hindu kings! Even the facial features of Kashmiris, like long noses, is evocative of the Middle East.
What do you think?
Hi Janki
ReplyDeleteNostalgia comes into picture only when there are places existing in the original homeland. The five places of Moses Burial are present only in Kashmir, not in the supposed original homeland of the middle-east. So nostalgia does not come into picture.
Given that Ramayan says Ram was born in Ayodhya. How would you feel if you cannot locate Ayodhya? Would you not immediately feel that all Ramayan is complete farce? Bhagavatam says Krishna was born at Mathura. How would you feel if Mathura cannot be located? would you not immediately feel Bhagavatam is complete farce?
As per bible, just before his death, Moses went up from the plains of Moab unto the mountain of Nebo, to the top of Pisgah. There, the Lord shows him the promised land, after which he is said to have died. He is said to have been buried in the valley of Moab, over against Beth-Peor. How should one feel if he or she cannot locate those five places? I leave it to your judgement on how one should feel about it. I do feel that the point of Moses being buried in middle-east is not tenable. Moses burial is located in Kashmir as all the mentioned five places are present in Kashmir. Nostalgia does not ener into picture here because these five places are not present in the supposed original homeland.
Thanks
Perhaps you are right!!
ReplyDeleteNostalgia may not play a part!
Thanks!
Hi
ReplyDeleteWhat is the similar name for Ishmael, the first son of Abhraham then
Thanks
Arun
Ishmael is not related to any one deity of Hinduism. It is actually a notional name. I can give what it means here, but it would not look so convincing right away. It would make sense only when you read as part of the whole context.
ReplyDeleteThanks
Prithviraj
When I was in school, my father used to tell me that actually all the intellectuals (Maharishis) were in India (of course, concept of India as a country was not there that time). But, due to some ego clashes one group got separated and it finally led to Christianity. Actually, my father used to refer to A-BRAHAM as Non-Brahman [like VAASTHAVAM-AVAASTHAVAM]. Then, from Christianity intellectuals another revolutionary group came out and this led to Islam....Can you throw some light on this theory?
ReplyDeleteThe aryan Invasion theory is totally bogus. The Vedic peoples of India have always been there, that is what their own history from the Vedas say going back over 5,000 years says.
ReplyDeleteIt still saddens me to see how widely and prolific this disinformation is in terms of distorting sanatan-dharma and its cultural history.
really i like you blog so much exactly not your blog only i like any blog speaks about Egypt and i have blog too about Ancient Egypt and any thing related about that for example ancient Egypt clothing,ancient Egypt facts,ancient Egypt for kids,ancient Egypt history,ancient Egypt map,ancient Egypt mummies,ancient Egypt religion,ancient Egypt timeline,ancient Egyptian art,ancient Egyptian culture,ancient Egyptian gods,ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics,ancient Egyptian jewelry , ancient Egyptian names thanks a lot so much ,,, Ancient-Egypt.Info
ReplyDelete